TMU
0.8
Volume 13, Issue 2 (2025)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2025, 13(2): 367-373 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |

Print XML PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Triana W, Asrial A, Guspianto G, Haryanto H. Interventions to Increase Knowledge and Attitude for Iron Consumption in Anemic Adolescents of Low-Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review. Health Educ Health Promot 2025; 13 (2) :367-373
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-4-80601-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
2- Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
3- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
* Corresponding Author Address: Prof. Dr. G.A. Siwabessy Street No.42, Buluran Kenali, Telanaipura District, Jambi City, Jambi, Indonesia. Postal Code: 36122 (trianawinda146@gmail.com)
Keywords:
    |   Abstract (HTML)  (638 Views)
Full-Text:   (80 Views)
Introduction
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a significant public health concern, particularly among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1-3]. Adolescents are highly vulnerable to IDA due to increased iron demands during growth and, in females, the onset of menstruation [4, 5]. IDA during adolescence is associated with adverse cognitive, physical, and social outcomes, including poor academic performance, fatigue, and diminished quality of life [6-8]. Addressing IDA in this demographic is essential to break the cycle of poor health and socio-economic disadvantage [9].
In many LMICs, barriers to addressing IDA include inadequate awareness of iron-rich diets, limited knowledge about the importance of iron supplementation, and cultural practices that influence dietary habits [10-13]. Adolescents often lack autonomy in dietary decisions, which are typically influenced by family members [14-18]. Furthermore, gender dynamics may limit access to iron-rich foods for adolescent girls. These challenges necessitate interventions that empower adolescents with knowledge and skills to improve their iron intake [19-21].
Educational interventions play a crucial role in addressing these barriers by improving knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to iron consumption [22, 23]. These interventions include school-based programs, community health campaigns, peer education, and digital learning tools designed to raise awareness about iron-rich foods, the role of iron in health, and strategies to overcome barriers to iron intake. Educational approaches can also address misconceptions and stigma associated with iron supplementation, especially among adolescent girls [24, 25].
Evidence suggests that educational interventions have the potential to significantly impact dietary behaviors and adherence to supplements [26, 27]. For example, school-based programs have demonstrated effectiveness in promoting healthy eating habits and increasing awareness about micronutrient deficiencies [28-31]. Similarly, community-based campaigns have been instrumental in mobilizing support for better nutritional practices at the household level. However, the success of these programs often depends on their cultural relevance, accessibility, and delivery methods [32, 33].
Previous systematic reviews have explored the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving general health outcomes, but few have focused specifically on increasing iron consumption among adolescents in LMICs [34-37]. Reviews on adolescent nutrition interventions often highlight the role of education as a complementary strategy to supplementation and food fortification, but lack a detailed analysis of education-focused initiatives [38, 39]. This gap in evidence hinders the ability to design and implement targeted strategies to combat IDA in this vulnerable population.
Studies in LMICs have reported mixed results for educational interventions targeting iron consumption. Some programs have shown significant improvements in knowledge and dietary practices, while others have struggled with low engagement or minimal long-term impact. Factors such as intervention design, delivery mode, cultural sensitivity, and community involvement are often cited as determinants of success [40-42]. However, there is limited synthesis of these findings to inform future interventions.
Adolescents represent a critical window of opportunity for nutritional interventions, given their unique developmental stage and potential to influence future generations. Effective educational interventions targeting this group can have a multiplier effect by improving their health and equipping them to make informed dietary decisions as adults [43]. Despite the importance of education, most IDA intervention programs in LMICs continue to focus on supplementation and food fortification, with insufficient emphasis on educational strategies [44, 45].
Moreover, addressing IDA through education requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates health, education, and community sectors. Understanding the effectiveness of various educational strategies, their implementation challenges, and the factors influencing their impact can guide policymakers and program implementers in designing effective interventions [46, 47].
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in increasing iron consumption among anemic adolescents in LMICs. By synthesizing existing evidence, this review aims to identify effective strategies, examine the contextual factors that influence their outcomes, and provide recommendations for designing and scaling educational programs to combat IDA in resource-constrained settings. This work fills a critical gap in the literature, offering insights into the role of education in addressing one of the most prevalent nutritional deficiencies among adolescents.

Information and Methods
This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, providing a transparent and comprehensive methodology [48]. The process involved developing eligibility criteria using the PICOS framework, conducting a systematic search, selecting relevant studies, extracting data, assessing bias, and synthesizing the results.
Eligibility criteria
The inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed using the PICOS framework. Eligible studies targeted adolescents aged 10-19 years who were diagnosed with anemia and resided in low- and middle-income countries (Population). Interventions included educational approaches aimed at increasing iron consumption, such as school-based programs, community-based education, peer education, or digital tools (Intervention). Comparators were no intervention, standard care, or other types of interventions (Comparator). Primary outcomes included dietary iron intake and adherence to iron supplementation; Secondary outcomes included hemoglobin levels, anemia prevalence, and knowledge, attitudes, and practices (Outcomes). Eligible study designs included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies (Study design).
Search strategy
A systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature was conducted. The search strategy combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free-text keywords, tailored for each database. Boolean operators and filters were used to refine the search (Table 1).

Table 1. Search strings for major databases
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/80601/1.png

Selection process
The selection of studies for this systematic review followed a rigorous, multi-step process to ensure that only relevant and high-quality studies were included. Initially, all records retrieved from the database searches were imported into Mendeley for de-duplication. Following this, two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of the remaining records to assess their relevance based on the inclusion criteria. Studies that did not meet the criteria, such as those focused on non-educational interventions or populations outside the 10–19-year age range, were excluded at this stage. After the initial screening, full-text articles of potentially eligible studies were retrieved and assessed by both reviewers. The inclusion criteria were further applied, considering the study design (e.g., RCTs, quasi-experimental studies), the type of educational intervention, and the population of adolescents with anemia in low- and middle-income countries. Any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion or by consulting a third reviewer. The final set of included studies was compiled, and the reasons for excluding studies at each stage were documented in a PRISMA flow diagram. This transparent selection process ensured that only studies with relevant and high-quality data were included for data extraction and analysis.
The systematic review initially identified 305 studies through systematic database searches across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Following a rigorous selection process, 151 duplicate records were removed. The remaining 149 articles underwent title and abstract screening, during which 122 studies were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The exclusion reasons included irrelevance to educational interventions, focus on populations outside the specified age range of 10-19 years, or targeting conditions other than iron deficiency anemia. After this step, 27 studies were evaluated in full text. Eleven of these were excluded for specific reasons: Five involved adult populations, four focused on interventions that were not educational, and two targeted pregnant women rather than adolescents. Ultimately, 16 studies met all inclusion criteria and were included in the review for data extraction and analysis. These selected studies represented diverse geographical locations, methodologies, and intervention designs, offering a robust dataset to evaluate the impact of educational strategies on anemia among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs; Figure 1).

src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/80601/f1.png
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart for study selection

Data collection
Data collection for this systematic review was conducted using a standardized data extraction form, which was developed to ensure consistency and accuracy across studies. Two independent reviewers performed the data extraction process. In cases where discrepancies arose between the reviewers, these were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. The data extraction form included information on study characteristics (e.g., author, year, country, setting, and study design), as well as details about the intervention (e.g., type, content, delivery method, duration, and frequency). For each study, the population characteristics were recorded, including the sample size, age range, and anemia status of the participants. The reviewers also extracted data related to the outcomes of interest, specifically the primary outcomes such as changes in dietary iron intake or adherence to iron supplementation, and secondary outcomes, including hemoglobin levels, anemia prevalence, and knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). The time points at which these outcomes were measured were also noted. If studies reported multiple outcomes or time points, the reviewers focused on the most relevant or earliest available data. This systematic and consistent data extraction process ensured that all pertinent information was gathered for the subsequent synthesis and analysis of the results.
Study quality
The reviewers individually assessed the literature to determine its suitability for inclusion in the review. While this step is not a requirement in systematic review protocols, they found it helpful for recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of the selected studies. Given the varied nature of the studies, the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) for randomized trials was selected, as it offers a structured framework for evaluating study quality. CASP provides specific checklists with 11 questions for each study design, particularly randomized trials, with answers categorized as “yes”, “no”, or “can’t tell”. The quality of each study is then classified as Strong, Moderate, or Weak based on the responses: Strong if all answers are affirmative, Moderate if two responses are negative, and Weak if three responses are negative.
Risk of bias
The potential bias of each study was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Randomized Studies (RoB 2) tool. This tool was selected for its proven, organized framework designed to identify biases specifically in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It covers key areas, including the process of randomization, deviations from intended interventions, missing outcome data, measurement of outcomes, and selective reporting. The RoB 2 tool provides a thorough and consistent approach to evaluating study quality, thereby enhancing the reliability of the review’s findings. It assesses both internal and external validity through five domains, categorizing results into four levels: Low, Some Concerns, High, and Very High. All authors reviewed and approved the bias assessment outcomes, incorporating feedback from external reviewers.
Data synthesis
The data synthesis for this systematic review followed a two-step process: A narrative synthesis and, where appropriate, a meta-analysis. A qualitative synthesis was performed to summarize the findings across all included studies. This narrative synthesis grouped the studies based on key themes, including the type of educational intervention, delivery method (e.g., in-person, digital, peer education), and reported outcomes (e.g., dietary iron intake, hemoglobin levels). This approach helped to provide an overview of the range of interventions and their effects on increasing iron consumption among anemic adolescents.

Findings
The characteristics of the included studies demonstrated a wide variation in design, sample size, and intervention strategies. The studies spanned multiple LMICs, with a notable concentration in Asia, including Indonesia, India, and Pakistan, as well as regions in Africa and the Middle East. Sample sizes ranged from as small as 15 participants in Raihani et al. [61] to as large as 455 participants in Salam et al. [60]. Most studies focused on adolescents aged 10-19 years, with mean ages varying slightly but consistently representing the target population. Educational interventions were delivered through various formats, including traditional classroom lectures, multimedia tools such as videos and apps, and interactive methods like role-playing and group discussions. These varied methodologies provided a comprehensive overview of approaches to addressing iron deficiency anemia in adolescents. The intervention duration also varied significantly, ranging from short-term programs lasting one month to longer-term efforts spanning up to six months. The content of the educational programs commonly included information on the importance of dietary iron, sources of iron-rich foods, proper supplementation practices, and strategies to overcome barriers to iron consumption. Many interventions incorporated culturally tailored content to enhance relevance and engagement, especially in community-based programs (Table 2).

Table 2. Extracted data of 16 final documents
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/80601/2-1.png
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/80601/2-2.png

In general, the eligible studies were categorized as Strong, while seven studies fell into the Medium category, and three studies were classified as Weak (Table 3).

Table 3. Summary of quality appraisal of eligible studies
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/80601/3.png

Based on the risk of bias assessment, there were three studies in the High RoB category and five studies in the Some Concerns category. However, overall, most studies fell into the Low RoB category (Figure 2).

src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/80601/f2.png
Figure 2. Visualization of RoB assessment

The primary outcomes assessed across the studies included dietary iron intake and adherence to iron supplementation. Secondary outcomes included changes in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, anemia prevalence, and knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to iron intake. The interventions demonstrated varied levels of effectiveness depending on their design, delivery methods, and cultural appropriateness.
Educational interventions consistently improved dietary iron intake among participants. Ten studies reported statistically significant increases in iron consumption following the intervention. For instance, Gambir et al. [52] in Indonesia implemented a diary-book system combined with counseling, which effectively increased participants' awareness and consumption of iron-rich foods (p<0.05). Similarly, Zuraida et al. [64] employed anemia-free club sessions that emphasized practical dietary modifications, resulting in a measurable improvement in dietary habits. These findings highlight the potential of interactive and participatory education methods in influencing adolescents’ dietary behaviors.
Adherence to iron supplementation also improved in many studies, particularly when interventions included counseling or culturally relevant materials. Jalambo et al. [54] in Palestine demonstrated that combining nutrition education with supplementation significantly enhanced both hemoglobin levels and ferritin concentrations (p < 0.001). Similarly, Rahmiwati et al. [59] integrated local cultural elements into nutrition education, which fostered better adherence to iron-folic acid supplementation; however, compliance levels remained variable due to external factors such as pill availability and participant motivation.
The secondary outcomes provided further evidence of the interventions' impact. Eight studies reported significant improvements in hemoglobin levels among participants. For example, Abu-Baker et al. [49] in Jordan used a combination of lectures, videos, and brochures to improve hemoglobin levels and overall knowledge of anemia (p < 0.001). Salam et al. [60] in India employed a blend of role-playing and practical demonstrations, which yielded similar results. Reductions in anemia prevalence were noted in studies like McCormack et al. [58] and Alaofé et al. [50], further underscoring the potential of educational approaches to complement traditional supplementation programs.
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to anemia and iron consumption showed substantial improvements across all 16 studies. Interventions involving interactive or participatory components appeared particularly effective. For instance, Rusdin et al. [62] in Indonesia utilized a combination of lectures, group discussions, and problem-solving activities, which significantly improved participants' motivation and behavior regarding iron consumption (p < 0.001). However, while knowledge gains were universal, the translation of this knowledge into long-term dietary behavior and adherence to supplementation varied, often depending on factors such as program duration and follow-up support.
Several key factors influenced the effectiveness of the educational interventions. Cultural relevance emerged as a critical determinant, as interventions tailored to local dietary habits and cultural norms consistently yielded better outcomes. For example, Rahmiwati et al. [59] successfully integrated cultural practices into the program design, fostering higher engagement and adherence rates among participants.
The method of delivery also played a significant role. Digital tools, including mobile applications and gamified learning approaches, were particularly effective in engaging adolescents. For instance, Magfirah et al. [57] utilized the LADIES App and e-posters delivered via WhatsApp, which not only increased knowledge (p<0.001) but also improved dietary nutrient intake. Similarly, Ghadam et al. [53] employed a digital gaming approach in conjunction with traditional presentations, achieving significant improvements in nutrient consumption (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that leveraging technology can enhance the accessibility and appeal of educational interventions for younger populations.
Another important factor was the duration and intensity of the interventions. Programs with longer durations and more frequent sessions tended to yield more sustained improvements in outcomes. For example, Madestria et al. [56] implemented a 12-week program with multiple sessions, resulting in significant improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward iron consumption.

Discussion
The findings of this systematic review highlight the effectiveness of educational interventions in addressing iron deficiency anemia (IDA) among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The analysis of the included studies highlights several critical themes related to the design, delivery, and outcomes of these interventions, providing valuable insights into their potential to address a significant public health issue. The review found consistent evidence that educational interventions improved dietary iron intake and adherence to iron supplementation among adolescents. This aligns with previous studies indicating that education is a powerful tool for fostering health-related behavior changes. By providing adolescents with the knowledge and skills to make informed dietary choices, these interventions addressed both the lack of awareness and the barriers associated with iron consumption. For example, studies such as those by Gambir et al. [52] and Zuraida et al. [64] demonstrated significant improvements in iron-rich food consumption following culturally tailored and interactive educational sessions. This supports the notion that interventions grounded in the local context are more likely to resonate with participants and effect meaningful beh