TMU
0.8
Volume 9, Issue 5 (2021)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2021, 9(5): 487-499 | Back to browse issues page

Print XML PDF HTML

History

How to cite this article
Karmanovskaya N, Nosova O, Kaverzin A. Public Environmental Monitoring of the State of Snowpack in Norilsk. Health Educ Health Promot 2021; 9 (5) :487-499
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-4-55986-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Non-Ferrous Metallurgy; Department of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Norilsk State Industrial Institute, Norilsk, Russian Federation
2- Department of Non-Ferrous Metallurgy, Norilsk State Industrial Institute, Norilsk, Russian Federation
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Non-Ferrous Metallurgy; Department of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Norilsk State Industrial Institute, 663310, Norilsk, Russian Federation
Keywords:
    |   Abstract (HTML)  (1539 Views)
Full-Text:   (630 Views)
Introduction
Show cover is a key element in monitoring and forecasting flood conditions since precipitation shows feed surface and groundwater, which largely depends on the distribution of show cover, its physical properties, and the nature of show melting—influencing the temperature and water regime. Influencing the regime of soils, the show cover itself becomes a powerful climate-forming factor [1-5].
Norilsk is located north of the Krasnoyarsk Krai and is the district’s administrative centre. The region is a zone of permafrost rocks, whose thickness is 40-80 m. It is one of the coldest cities in the world. It is much colder than Murmansk, even though both cities are located almost at the same latitude. Norilsk is located 300 km north of the Arctic Circle, 2400 km from the North Pole, and 1500 km to the capital of the Krasnoyarsk Krai. It is considered that Norilsk ranks second in pollution of air, into which enterprises annually emit large amounts of sulphur dioxide, phenols, and heavy metal particles. The cold and long winter with January temperatures of -40⁰C is exacerbated by very strong winds. The period of severe cold lasts about 280 days, from mid-September to early May, of which blizzards accompany 130 days. The summer period begins at the end of June and lasts until the end of August. On average, the frost-free period lasts 84 days, and sometimes its duration is reduced to 53 days. The relative humidity is 76%. The snow cover can lie from 244 to 277 days.
Snow is a good sorbing agent. Therefore, it imbibes solid and gaseous pollutants from the atmosphere. It is possible to judge air pollution from enterprises and transport emissions by the state of the snow cover. During the thawing period, pollutants contained in the snow cover enter the soil and water bodies, causing environmental damage.
It was established that zinc determines the total show cover contamination index, as well as in the case of soil. A high positive correlation was found between the coefficient of zinc concentration in the show cover and soil, which may indicate a constant supply of this pollution index. Winter flux is an important assessment element when estimating the annual carbon budget on a regional and global scale. The scientific sanitary assessment of water is one of the most difficult problems of sanitary examination. Snellen font for measuring water transparency [5-10].
Colour is a natural property of meltwater due to humic substances formed when organic compounds are destroyed in the soil, are washed out of it, and give snow and meltwater a colour from yellowish to brown. The colour of meltwater can be imparted by iron compounds (yellow-greenish colouration), flowering algae, suspended solids, sewage pollution, etc. The colour of meltwater is determined photometrically; it should not be higher than 20°, then the water is considered colourless.
Pure snow is odourless. It should be borne in mind that the smell can appear in the meltwater due to contamination with organic and inorganic impurities. The nature and intensity of the odour are determined by the perceived smell. There are two groups of odours: natural and artificial odours. The intensity of the liquid odour is assessed using a 5-point system, presented in Table 1. The smell of water should not exceed 2 points.

Table 1) Odour intensity assessment
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986/55986-T_1.png
Transparency is a water quality indicator that simplifies and quickly controls suspended solids' content and colloidal impurities. The measure of transparency is the height of the water column through which the control object can still be observed. Depending on the type of this object, it is customary to distinguish between several types of transparency. When observing a white (usually porcelain) board or disc with a diameter of 20 cm, the transparency over the disc is determined. This value is measured only for waters of surface water bodies (rivers, lakes, reservoirs). Transparency (turbidity) depends on the presence of suspended solids of mineral or organic origin in the meltwater; increased turbidity indicates its contamination with solid particles from the air.
Hydrogen ion exponent (pH) - characterises the concentration of free hydrogen ions in water and expresses the degree of acidity or alkalinity of water (the ratio of H+ and OH- ions in water formed during the water dissociation) and is quantitatively determined by the concentration of hydrogen ions pH = - Ig [H+]. The pH value in river waters usually varies within 6.5-8.5, in atmospheric precipitation 4.6-6.1, in swamps 5.5-6.0, in sea waters 7.9-8.3. By the requirements for the composition and properties of water in reservoirs near drinking water points, water bodies in recreational areas, as well as water in fishery water bodies, the pH value should not go beyond the 6.5-8.5 range.
Salinity (total mineralisation) is a quantitative indicator of the content of substances dissolved in water. It is also called the total salt content since the substances dissolved in water are salts. The most common inorganic salts (bicarbonates, chlorides, and sulphates of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium) and a small amount of organic matter soluble in water. The total mineralisation is confused with the dry residue. These parameters are very close, but the methods for determining them are different. When determining the dry residue, more volatile organic compounds dissolved in water are not considered. As a result, the total salinity and dry matter may differ by these volatile compounds (usually no more than 10%). The salinity level in drinking water is due to water quality in natural sources (which vary significantly in different geological regions due to the different solubility of minerals; Table 2).
In addition to factors caused by nature, anthropogenic factors greatly influence the general mineralisation of water: industrial wastewater, urban stormwater runoff (salt is used in winter as a de-icing agent), etc. According to the World Health Organisation, there is no reliable information on the health effects of high salt content.

Table 2) Categories of water salinity
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986/55986-T_2.png
For medical reasons, the WHO does not impose restrictions. As a rule, water taste is considered normal with a total mineralisation of up to 600mg/L, with a salt content of more than 1000-1200mg/L; water can cause complaints from consumers; in this regard, WHO recommends a limit for total mineralisation of 1000mg/L for organoleptic indications. This level may vary depending on prevailing habits and local conditions. People consume low salt content in developed countries - water purified by reverse osmosis technology. Such water is the purest and most harmless; it is widely used in the food industry, bottled water, etc. See: “Water and mineral matter” for more information on minerals and water. A separate topic is the value of mineralisation during the scaling and precipitation in the heating, boiler, and plumbing equipment. In this case, special requirements apply to the water, and the lower the level of mineralisation (especially the content of hardness salts), the better.
The presence of ferrous and ferric iron, manganese, aluminium, nitrate, etc., does not seriously affect electrical conductivity (unless, of course, these ions are contained in water in significant quantities). Electrical conductivity is not standardised, but a value of 2000μS/cm roughly corresponds to the total mineralisation of 1000mg/L. As already noted, the electrical conductivity changes with temperature, leading to measurement errors. With the help of electrical conductivity, it is possible to indirectly estimate the electrochemical composition of water and compare it with the parameters of the favourable environment for the development of living organisms. Conductometers are devices for measuring resistivity or conductivity used to monitor the quality of water, condensate or steam. The main purpose of conductometers is to analyse the properties and quality of water its suitability for economical use.
Hypothesis: the snow cover accumulates pollutants found in dust-gas emissions from industrial enterprises and vehicle exhaust gases. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the snow cover in the Norilsk industrial region and assess the state of atmospheric air in the winter. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve the following tasks: conduct a literature review on a given topic; take samples of snow in various industrial districts of Norilsk (IDN) (from the streets and near the roadsides); study the dependence of the qualitative characteristics of snow on the sampling site; conclude the quality of snow cover in different areas of the IDN. Stages of research:
1. Conducting a literature review.
2. Preparing an experiment programme.
3. Snow sampling.
4. Preparation of reagents and equipment for the experiment.
5. Carrying out an experiment.
6. Processing of the received data and plotting of dependency diagrams.
7. Preparing a written report on the results of research work.

Materials and Methods
This experimental study was conducted in 2019. The organoleptic (ancient Greek: ὄργανον – tool, instrument + λεπτικός – to take, accept) method was used for determining quality indicators based on the analysis of sensory perception; sight, smell, hearing, touch, taste. The values of the indicators were determined by analysing the expert’s feelings based on his experience of assessment and, as a rule, were expressed in points or places of the samples on an imaginary scale. The advantages include the availability and speed of determining the quality indicators and no need for expensive equipment for measurements. Most people have sufficient sensory (sensitive) capabilities to organoleptically assess appearance, taste, smell, and texture. The disadvantages of organoleptic methods include the subjectivity of the assessment, the relative expression of its results in dimensionless quantities (colour - green, red, etc.; taste - sweet pronounced, mild, tasteless, etc.), incomparability, and insufficient reproducibility of the results. Each of these organoleptic methods is carried out with the help of certain human sensory organs, while the values of specific quality indicators are measured (Table 3).

Table 3) The relationship of organoleptic methods and quality indicators
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986/55986-T_3.png

Visual method – a method based on the perception of the appearance and/or colour of an object with the help of sight. Appearance is a complex indicator that includes colour, odour, turbidity and is determined visually. With the help of sight, a person receives the most information (70-80%). Visual assessment is one of the most common and accessible ones.
With the Stennen font. A standard font is placed under a cylinder 60cm high and 3-3.5cm in diameter at a distance of 4cm from the bottom; the test sample is poured into the cylinder so that the font is readable, and the maximum height of the water column is determined. The method for the quantitative determination of transparency is based on determining the height of the water column, at which it is still possible to visually distinguish (read) a black font with a height of 3.5mm and a line width of 0.35mm on a white background, or see an adjustment mark (for example, a black cross on white paper). The method used is unified and complies with ISO 7027. The classification of water by transparency is given in Table 4.

Table 4) Water transparency assessment
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986-1/55986-T_4.png

There is a relationship between the transparency by the cross, the transparency by the font and the content of suspended solids, which is presented in Table 4. However, the content of suspended solids by the transparency value can be estimated rather approximately since the latter also depends on the colour of substances dissolved in water.
The indicators determined by the potentiometric method are based on using the electromotive force of the electrochemical (potentiometric) cell of the analyte concentration in the analysed solution. The simplest potentiometric cell contains two electrodes; the potential of one of them directly or indirectly depends on the concentration of the substance being determined - it is called an indicating (ion-selective) electrode; and a second electrode concerning which the potential of the indicating electrode is measured, called a reference electrode.
The potentiometric analysis provides the ability to directly and selectively determine different elements and different ionic forms of the same element (NH4+, NO2-, NO3-, S-2, SO4-2, Cl-), which is of particular importance for environmental analysis. The method’s advantages are simplicity, speed, low cost of equipment, the ability to analyse turbid and coloured media.
Determination of water salinity is carried out by calculation method as the total concentration of anions, cations and non-dissociated inorganic substances in water, expressed in g/dm3 (Table 5).

Table 5) Classification of mineral waters by salinity
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986-1/55986-T_5.png

Conductivity is used to estimate the total solids dissolved in water. Conductometry is based on the numerical indicator of this physical quantity. Considering specifically water, which is a solution of a mixture of strong and weak electrolytes: the mineral part of the water is made up of sodium, potassium, calcium, chlorine, sulphate (SO42-), bicarbonate ions, it can be concluded that these ions determine the electrical conductivity of water.
The colour of the water is determined photometrically - by comparing samples of the test liquid with solutions that imitate the colour of natural water. The following equipment, materials, reagents are used for testing: colour density meter with a blue light filter; sample cells with a thickness of the light-absorbing layer of 5-10 cm; volumetric flasks in accordance with GOST 1770, with a capacity of 1000 cm3; measuring pipettes according to GOST 29227, with a capacity of 1, 5, 10 cm with divisions of 0.1 cm; Nessler tubes with a capacity of 100 cm; potassium dichromate according to GOST 4220; cobalt sulphate according to GOST 4462; sulphuric acid according to GOST 4204, with a density of 1.84 g/cm; distilled water in accordance with GOST 6709; membrane filters No. 4 [3; 4]. All reagents used in the analysis must be of the analytical-reagent grade.
Test preparation:
1. Preparation of the standard solution (solution No. 1): 0.0875 g of potassium dichromate (KCrO), 2.0 g of cobalt sulphate (CoSO·7HO) and 1 ml of sulfuric acid (density 1.84 g/cm) are dissolved in distilled water and the volume of the solution is brought to 1 dm3. The solution corresponds to a colour of 500°.
2. Preparation of a dilute sulphuric acid solution (solution No. 2): 1 cm3 of concentrated sulphuric acid with a density of 1.84 g/cm3 is brought to 1 dm3 with distilled water.
3. Preparation of the colourimetric scale. To prepare the colourimetric scale, a set of Nessler tubes with a capacity of 100 cm is used. In each cylinder, solution No. 1 and solution No. 2 are mixed in the ratio indicated on the colourimetric scale (Table 6). The solution in each tube corresponds to a certain degree of colour. The colourimetric scale is stored in a dark place. It is replaced every 2-3 months [9].

Table 6) Colour grade
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986-1/55986-T_6.png

4. Construction of a calibration curve. A calibration graph is plotted on a colourimetric scale. The obtained values of optical densities and the corresponding degrees of colour are plotted on the graph.
Testing. In a Nessler tube, 100 cm of the test water, filtered through a membrane filter, is measured and compared with the colourimetric scale, viewing from above on a white background. If the test water sample has a colour of more than 70°, the sample should be diluted with distilled water in a certain ratio until the colour of the test water is comparable to the colour of the scale. The result is multiplied by the number corresponding to the dilution.
When determining the chromaticity using a photocolorimeter, sample cells with a thickness of the light-absorbing layer of 5-10 cm are used. The control liquid is distilled water, from which suspended substances are removed by filtration through membrane filters No. 4. The optical density of the filtrate of the test water sample is measured in the blue part of the spectrum with a light filter at = 413 nm. The colour is determined by a grading schedule and is expressed in degrees of colour. Organoleptic methods determine the nature and intensity of the odour.
Testing: the nature of the water odour is determined at 20°C by the smell. In a flask with a ground plug with a capacity of 250-350 cm3, 100 cm3 of test water at a temperature of 20°C is measured. The flask is closed with a plug, the contents of the flask are stirred several times with rotary movements, after which the flask is opened and the nature and intensity of the smell is determined.
Determination of odour at 60°C: 100 cm3 of test water is poured into a flask. The neck of the flask is closed with a watch glass and heated in a water bath to 50-60°C. The contents of the flask are mixed several times with rotary movements. Moving the glass to the side, the nature and intensity of the odour is determined. The intensity of the water odour is determined at 20 and 60°C and is assessed using a five-point system. For example: at 20°C first tap (Volga river) – no odour – 0 points, at 60°C first tap (Volga river) – earthy odour – 1 point; second tap (filtered reservoir) – chlorine odour – 1 point; 2 taps (filtered reservoir) – chlorine reservoir – 2 points.
The Snellen transparency of the wastewater, according to the method [1], is determined with the Snellen cylinder. The test water is thoroughly mixed (shaken) and poured into a cylinder, under which a text printed in Snellen's font on white paper is placed at a distance of 4 cm from the bottom of the cylinder (Figure 1). The excess water is drained off with a tap or a tube while stirring continuously with a glass rod until the text is readable. The height of the liquid column is read off the scale applied to the cylinder with an accuracy of 0.5cm.
The scientific sanitary assessment of water is one of the most difficult problems of sanitary examination. Snellen font for measuring water transparency [10]. The result is expressed in centimetres as the arithmetic means of the two definitions. The cross transparency is determined using a white plate with two crossed black lines 1 mm in thickness. This method is used to control the operation of treatment facilities. In thermal power engineering, the most often used is font transparency (by Snellen), equal to the height of the water column, through which the standard typographic font with a letter height of 3.5 mm is still readable.

src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986/55986-F_1.png
Figure 1) Snellen transparency method

Equipment and reagents: burette 25 cm3, stand, ammonium buffer mixture (NH4OH + NH4Cl) with pH 8-9, complexone ΙΙΙ (Trilon B) 0.1 N, indicator eriochrome black (sugar mixture of 1 g indicator + 99 g sodium chloride), conical flasks with a capacity of 250 cm3, measuring cylinders for 100 cm3, 10 cm3. The sequence of procedures: a 100 cm3 sample is placed in a conical flask, 10 cm3 of an ammonium buffer mixture, 10-20 mg of an indicator are poured into a small cylinder, stirred and titrated with a Trilon B solution until the colour of the solution changes from wine red to blue. The total stiffness is calculated using the formula (Eq. 1):
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986/55986-Fo_1.png
where: V – the volume of 0.1 N Trilon B solution used for titration, C – concentration of Trilon B solution, W – aliquot part of the sample.
There are several methods for determining the pH value of solutions. The pH is roughly estimated using indicators, accurately measured with a pH meter, or determined analytically, by conducting an acid-base titration:
  1. For a rough estimate of hydrogen ions concentration, acid-base indicators are often used – organic dye substances, the colour of which depends on the pH of the medium. The most popular indicators: litmus, phenolphthalein, methyl orange, etc. Indicators can be in 2 differently coloured forms – either acidic or basic. The colour change of all indicators occurs in their acidity range, often 1-2 units.
  2. To increase the working range of pH measurement, a universal indicator is used, which is a mixture of several indicators. The universal indicator sequentially changes colour from red through yellow, green, blue to violet when passing from an acidic region to an alkaline one. Determination of pH by the indicator method is difficult for turbid or coloured solutions.
  3. The use of a special device – a pH meter – makes it possible to measure pH in a wider range and more accurately (up to 0.01 pH units) than using indicators. The ionometric method for determining pH is based on measuring a galvanic circuit with a millivoltmeter-ionometer, which includes a glass electrode, the potential of which depends on the concentration of H+ ions in the surrounding solution. The method has high accuracy and convenience, especially after calibration of the indicator electrode in the selected pH range, which makes it possible to measure the pH of turbid and coloured solutions and therefore is often used [11; 12].
The electrometric method for determining salinity is based on measuring the relative electrical conductivity of water using a special device - a conductometer, which makes it possible to accelerate and increase the accuracy of its determination in comparison with other methods.
The operating principle of the conductometer is based on the direct dependence of the electrical conductivity of water (current strength in a constant electric field created by the electrodes of the device) on the number of compounds dissolved in water. A wide range of relevant equipment now allows measuring the conductivity of almost any water, from ultraclean (very low conductivity) to saturated with chemical compounds (high conductivity) [13-15].
Equipment and reagents: conductometer T.D.S hoa ld, a beaker with a capacity of 25 cm3. The sequence of procedures: the active conductometer is placed in the glass with the test sample, after the sound signal the result is written into the table. The method for determining suspended solids is based on separating them from a sample by filtering water through a pre-weighed dried paper or membrane filter and determining the mass of the filter cake dried to constant weight at (105 ± 2)°C.
The determination of Pb2+/ ions is as follows: the test meltwater is placed in a test tube to a height of 1-2 cm and 1 cm3 of sodium sulphide (Na2S) solution of concentration is added (Eq. 2):
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986/55986-Fo_2.png
The determination of Fe+2 ions is as follows (Eq. 3):
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986/55986-Fo_3.png
Reactions of the iron (II) cation Fe2+: solutions of Fe2+ salts are coloured in pale green. Potassium hexacyanoferrate (III) K3[Fe(CN)6] with Fe2+ ion gives dark blue precipitate (Eq. 4):
src=./files/hehp/images/HTML_Publish/55986/55986-Fo_3.png
Add 2-3 drops of Fe2+ salt solution to 1-2 drops of K3[Fe(CN)6] solution. The reaction is sensitive and is most often used to detect Fe2+.
The determination of Fe+3 ions

Send email to the article author