TMU
Owner
Tarbiat Modares University (TMU) is the owner of HEHP.
0.8
Cite Score 2025
Volume 14, Issue 2 (2026)
Health Educ Health Promot 2026, 14(2): 239-246 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
History
Received: 2026/03/13 | Accepted: 2026/05/22 | Published: 2026/06/17
Received: 2026/03/13 | Accepted: 2026/05/22 | Published: 2026/06/17
How to cite this article
Pócs D, Millner M, Vaszkó D, Watti J, Kelemen O. A School-Based, Multi-Component Intervention to Prevent Adolescent Tobacco and Cannabis Use. Health Educ Health Promot 2026; 14 (2) :239-246
URL: http://hehp.daneshafarand.org/article-4-87228-en.html
URL: http://hehp.daneshafarand.org/article-4-87228-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- “Cardiology Center” and “Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School”, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
2- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
2- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Abstract (29 Views)
Aims: Schools represent a key setting for substance use prevention during adolescence. Multicomponent, school-based programs aim to influence knowledge, attitudes, and social norms simultaneously; however, evidence regarding their effectiveness remains inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and indicative effects of a multicomponent, school-based intervention targeting tobacco and cannabinoid use among adolescents.
Materials & Methods: This prospective observational study was implemented at a Hungarian secondary school. Anonymous, self-report questionnaires were administered before, during, and after the intervention (n=417, n=497, and n=631, respectively). Outcome indicators included the lifetime and 30-day prevalence of tobacco and cannabinoid use, knowledge, attitudes, and participation in individual program components.
Findings: Lifetime tobacco use increased from 48% to 56% and 58%, while lifetime cannabinoid use increased from 14% to 18% and 19% across the three waves; monthly use also increased for tobacco (23%, 25%, 25%) and cannabinoids (6%, 7%, 8%), with no overall reduction over time. Participation averaged 2.22±1.49 program elements in Wave 2 and 2.40±1.62 in Wave 3. Peer-group activities and the prevention quiz were associated with lower cannabinoid experimentation (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.05; χ²(1)=4.12, p<0.05), while poster and quiz participation was associated with tobacco use or experimentation (χ²(1)=4.20, 6.34, and 5.45; all p<0.05). Tobacco-related knowledge increased from 83% to 89% during the program but declined slightly to 87% afterward, while protective attitudes returned to 59%.
Conclusion: A multicomponent, school-based prevention program is feasible and acceptable, reaches higher-risk adolescents, and warrants further rigorous evaluation despite not significantly reducing substance use prevalence.
Materials & Methods: This prospective observational study was implemented at a Hungarian secondary school. Anonymous, self-report questionnaires were administered before, during, and after the intervention (n=417, n=497, and n=631, respectively). Outcome indicators included the lifetime and 30-day prevalence of tobacco and cannabinoid use, knowledge, attitudes, and participation in individual program components.
Findings: Lifetime tobacco use increased from 48% to 56% and 58%, while lifetime cannabinoid use increased from 14% to 18% and 19% across the three waves; monthly use also increased for tobacco (23%, 25%, 25%) and cannabinoids (6%, 7%, 8%), with no overall reduction over time. Participation averaged 2.22±1.49 program elements in Wave 2 and 2.40±1.62 in Wave 3. Peer-group activities and the prevention quiz were associated with lower cannabinoid experimentation (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.05; χ²(1)=4.12, p<0.05), while poster and quiz participation was associated with tobacco use or experimentation (χ²(1)=4.20, 6.34, and 5.45; all p<0.05). Tobacco-related knowledge increased from 83% to 89% during the program but declined slightly to 87% afterward, while protective attitudes returned to 59%.
Conclusion: A multicomponent, school-based prevention program is feasible and acceptable, reaches higher-risk adolescents, and warrants further rigorous evaluation despite not significantly reducing substance use prevalence.
Keywords: