en Original Research <span style=font-size:11pt><span style=line-height:normal><span style=font-family:Arial,sans-serif><b><span lang=EN style=font-size:10.0pt><span style=font-family:Cambria,serif><span style=color:#4f81bd>Aims:</span></span></span></b><span lang=EN style=font-size:10.0pt><span style=font-family:Cambria,serif><span style=color:black> The study seeks to ascertain the instruments used in research pertaining to the area under evaluation, as well as the validity of these instruments.</span></span></span></span></span></span><br> <span style=font-size:11pt><span style=line-height:normal><span style=font-family:Arial,sans-serif><b><span lang=EN style=font-size:10.0pt><span style=font-family:Cambria,serif><span style=color:#4f81bd>Information & Methods:</span></span></span></b> <span lang=EN style=font-size:10.0pt><span style=font-family:Cambria,serif><span style=color:black>This scoping review is conducted using the PRISMA-SCR guidelines and utilized the Scoping Review Framework, which consists of five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, data charting, and summarizing and reporting results. The review focused on assessing instruments used to evaluate nurses' experiences with Traditional and Complementary Medicine (T&CM). A literature search was conducted in March 2024 across six databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and GARUDA, to identify studies published between 2014 and 2024. </span></span></span></span></span></span><br> <span style=font-size:11pt><span style=line-height:normal><span style=font-family:Arial,sans-serif><b><span lang=EN style=font-size:10.0pt><span style=font-family:Cambria,serif><span style=color:#4f81bd>Findings:</span></span></span></b> <span lang=EN style=font-size:10.0pt><span style=font-family:Cambria,serif><span style=color:black>A total of 18 relevant studies from 12 countries across continents, with the majority from Asia, are included. The domains assessed include nurses' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, practices, and communication related to T&CM. Although most instruments were validated, some studies did not report tests of validity and reliability.</span></span></span></span></span></span><br> <span style=font-size:11pt><span style=line-height:normal><span style=font-family:Arial,sans-serif><b><span lang=EN style=font-size:10.0pt><span style=font-family:Cambria,serif><span style=color:#4f81bd>Conclusion:</span></span></span></b><span lang=EN style=font-size:10.0pt><span style=font-family:Cambria,serif><span style=color:black> The instruments used to measure nurses' attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, practices, and communication regarding T&CM are primarily self-developed or adapted from previous research, with varied reliability and validity testing. Most studies focused on assessing attitudes and knowledge, while fewer addressed beliefs or communication.</span></span></span></span></span></span><br> Nurse,Instrument,Traditional Medicine,Alternative Medicine, 459 469 http://hehp.daneshafarand.org/browse.php?a_code=A-10-82896-1&slc_lang=en&sid=4 W. Nurmila 1003194753284600339015 1003194753284600339015 No Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia K.A. Erika 1003194753284600339016 1003194753284600339016 Yes Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia E. Erfina 1003194753284600339017 1003194753284600339017 No Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia