TMU
Owner
Tarbiat Modares University (TMU) is the owner of HEHP.
0.8
Cite Score 2025
Volume 14, Issue 1 (2026)
Health Educ Health Promot 2026, 14(1): 19-27 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
History
Received: 2025/12/1 | Accepted: 2025/12/24 | Published: 2025/11/19
Received: 2025/12/1 | Accepted: 2025/12/24 | Published: 2025/11/19
How to cite this article
Syam A, Fadli F, Syam A, Amelia A, Toaha A. Validation of Mobile Application Usability Questionnaire for Evaluation of Usability of the Mommy-Be Application in Indonesia. Health Educ Health Promot 2026; 14 (1) :19-27
URL: http://hehp.daneshafarand.org/article-4-83009-en.html
URL: http://hehp.daneshafarand.org/article-4-83009-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abstract (912 Views)
Aims: Mobile health [mHealth] applications have emerged as an effective approach to supporting maternal breastfeeding health. However, adopting these applications often faces challenges in terms of usability and user satisfaction. This study aims to adapt and validate the Malay language version of the Mobile Application Usability Questionnaire [MAUQ] instrument in the context of the Mommy-Be application in Indonesia.
Methods: This research method uses a descriptive quantitative design with a Confirmatory Factor Analysis [CFA] approach to test the validity of the instrument. Data was collected from 386 breastfeeding mothers from 400 invitations distributed via social media applications in each primary health service.
Findings: A total of 386 breastfeeding mothers in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, participated in a two-week application trial. The results of the first model test showed a CFI value of 0.548 and a TLI of 0.477, indicating a less-than-ideal model fit. After removing items with high Modification Indices [MI] values, the second model showed a significant improvement with a CFI of 0.972, a TLI of 0.966, and an RMSEA of 0.062.
Conclusion: These results highlight the importance of adapting instruments to the local context and technical conditions of the application. The results of this study are expected to support the development of health applications that are more in line with the needs of local users.
Methods: This research method uses a descriptive quantitative design with a Confirmatory Factor Analysis [CFA] approach to test the validity of the instrument. Data was collected from 386 breastfeeding mothers from 400 invitations distributed via social media applications in each primary health service.
Findings: A total of 386 breastfeeding mothers in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, participated in a two-week application trial. The results of the first model test showed a CFI value of 0.548 and a TLI of 0.477, indicating a less-than-ideal model fit. After removing items with high Modification Indices [MI] values, the second model showed a significant improvement with a CFI of 0.972, a TLI of 0.966, and an RMSEA of 0.062.
Conclusion: These results highlight the importance of adapting instruments to the local context and technical conditions of the application. The results of this study are expected to support the development of health applications that are more in line with the needs of local users.
Keywords:
| | Full-Text (HTML) (39 Views)
References
1. Chib A, Lin SH. Theoretical advancements in mHealth: A systematic review of mobile apps. J Health Commun. 2018;23(10-11):909-55. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10810730.2018.1544676]
2. Lin TT, Bautista JR. Understanding the relationships between mHealth apps' characteristics, trialability, and mHealth literacy. J Health Commun. 2017;22(4):346-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10810730.2017.1296508]
3. Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi CWJ, Salarzadeh Jenatabadi H, Samsudin N. mHealth apps assessment among postpartum women with obesity and depression. Healthcare. 2020;8(2):72. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/healthcare8020072]
4. Powell AC, Torous J, Chan S, Raynor GS, Shwarts E, Shanahan M, et al. Interrater reliability of mHealth app rating measures: Analysis of top depression and smoking cessation apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(1):e15. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/mhealth.5176]
5. Latour C, O'Byrne L, McCarthy M, Chacko R, Russell E, Price RK. Improving mental health in U.S. Veterans using mHealth tools: A pilot study. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(4):3201-14. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1460458220954613]
6. Schindler-Ruwisch JM, Roess A, Robert RC, Napolitano MA, Chiang S. Social support for breastfeeding in the era of mHealth: A content analysis. J Hum Lact. 2018;34(3):543-55. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0890334418773302]
7. Laws RA, Cheng H, Rossiter C, Kuswara K, Markides BR, Size D, et al. Perinatal support for breastfeeding using mHealth: A mixed methods feasibility study of the My Baby Now app. Matern Child Nutr. 2023;19(2):e13482. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/mcn.13482]
8. Qian J, Wu T, Lv M, Fang Z, Chen M, Zeng Z, et al. The value of mobile health in improving breastfeeding outcomes among perinatal or postpartum women: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(7):e26098. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/26098]
9. Padró-Arocas A, Quifer-Rada P, Aguilar-Camprubí L, Mena-Tudela D. Description of an mHealth tool for breastfeeding support: LactApp. Analysis of how lactating mothers seek support at critical breastfeeding points and according to their infant's age. Res Nurs Health. 2021;44(1):173-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/nur.22095]
10. Syam A, Dewi I, Firawati F. Usability study of the mommy-be app: Exploring the experience of breastfeeding mothers in eastern Indonesia. REVISTA DE GESTÃO SOCIAL E AMBIENTAL. 2024;18(3):e05253. [Link] [DOI:10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-089]
11. Liew MS, Zhang J, See J, Ong YL. Usability challenges for health and wellness mobile apps: Mixed-methods study among mHealth experts and consumers. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(1):e12160. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/12160]
12. Alam MZ, Hoque MdR, Hu W, Barua Z. Factors influencing the adoption of mHealth services in a developing country: A patient-centric study. Int J Inf Manag. 2020;50:128-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.016]
13. Aamir J, Ali SM, Kamel Boulos MN, Anjum N, Ishaq M. Enablers and inhibitors: A review of the situation regarding mHealth adoption in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Technol. 2018;7(1):88-97. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2017.11.005]
14. Feroz A, Perveen S, Aftab W. Role of mHealth applications for improving antenatal and postnatal care in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):704. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2664-7]
15. Zhou L, Bao J, Setiawan IMA, Saptono A, Parmanto B. The mHealth app usability questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e11500. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/11500]
16. Mustafa N, Safii NS, Jaffar A, Sani NS, Mohamad MI, Abd Rahman AH, et al. Malay version of the mHealth app usability questionnaire (M-MAUQ): Translation, adaptation, and validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(2):e24457. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/24457]
17. Shan Y, Ji M, Xie W, Li R, Qian X, Zhang X, et al. Chinese version of the mobile health app usability questionnaire: Translation, adaptation, and validation study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(7):e37933. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/37933]
18. Moorthy P, Weinert L, Harms BC, Anders C, Siegel F. German version of the mHealth app usability questionnaire in a cohort of patients with cancer: Translation and validation study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023;10:e51090. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/51090]
19. Lewis JR. The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2018;34(7):577-90. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307]
20. Zhou L, Bao J, Watzlaf V, Parmanto B. Barriers to and facilitators of the use of mobile health apps from a security perspective: Mixed-methods study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e11223. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/11223]
21. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Wilson H. Development and validation of the user version of the mobile application rating scale (uMARS). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(2). [Link] [DOI:10.2196/mhealth.5849]
22. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319-40. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/249008]
23. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012;36(1):157-78. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/41410412]
24. Kamal SA, Shafiq M, Kakria P. Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol Soc. 2020;60:101212. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212]
25. Rajak M, Shaw K. An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption. Technol Soc. 2021;67:101800. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101800]
26. Wallace LG, Sheetz SD. The adoption of software measures: A technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. Inf Manag. 2014;51(2):249-59. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.im.2013.12.003]
27. Almohanna AA, Win KT, Meedya S. Effectiveness of internet-based electronic technology interventions on breastfeeding outcomes: Systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e17361. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/17361]
28. Lau Y, Htun TP, Tam WSW, Klainin‐Yobas P. Efficacy of e‐technologies in improving breastfeeding outcomes among perinatal women: A meta‐analysis. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12(3):381-401. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/mcn.12202]
29. Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Rodgers A, Gu Y. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):CD006611. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub4]
30. Hasan DS, Arief YS, Krisnana I. Mobile application intervention to improve nutritional literacy of mothers with stunting children: A systematic review. Pediomatern Nurs J. 2024;10(2):70-5. [Link] [DOI:10.20473/pmnj.v10i2.47436]
31. Pratiwi R, Atmaka DR, Sutoyo DAR, Mahmudiono T. The effectiveness of smartphone-based nutrition education intervention in successful practice of exclusively breastfeeding: A meta-analysis. AMERTA Nut. 2023;7(4):615-25. [Link] [DOI:10.20473/amnt.v7i4.2023.615-625]
32. Amalia R, Indriani D, Laili U, Windarti Y, Nisa F. The KIA book's digitalization as a means to educate breastfeeding and postpartum moms on their children's health. South East Eur J Public Health. 2024;23(3):487-91. [Link] [DOI:10.70135/seejph.vi.878]
33. Dahoklory DF, Haryanto J, Indarwati R. The application of digital health as a nursing solution for leprosy patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(Suppl 2):S170-4. [Link] [DOI:10.47391/JPMA.Ind-S2-38]
34. Pratiwi LD, Haryanto J, Wahyudi AS. The effect of foot self care and diabetes self-management mobile application in preventing foot ulcer recurrence: A systematic review study. Malays J Med Health Sci. 2023;19:109-16. [Link]
35. Astani NMMW, Ati NLPAP, Ernawaty. Analysis of acceptance of e-health application by users in primary healthcare center in Surabaya city. Indones J Public Health. 2021;16(1):66-78. [Link] [DOI:10.20473/ijph.v16i1.2021.66-78]
36. Purwanto CR, Sukartini T, Bakar A, Devy SR. Increasing self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes through the implementation of a nursing agency based on the health promotion model. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(Suppl 2):S13004. [Link] [DOI:10.47391/JPMA.Ind-S2-31]
Send email to the article author